Getting the best mountain bike tyres for the type of riding you do and the conditions you typically encounter can be a real headache.
Get it right, however, and tyres – which you’ll need to match to your mountain bike wheel sizes – can make a big difference to how your ride behaves. You can spend all you want on the best mountain bike wheels, but they won’t fulfil their potential without suitable tyres.
Why is it so tough to find the right tyres? First, there’s a lot of assumed knowledge with MTB tyres.
You’re expected to know what a mud tyre should look like and where it will perform best. The best winter mountain bike tyres are worth considering if you ride a lot in the wet.
You need to know what type of tread pattern works well on smooth or bumpy terrain, and you need a decent knowledge about carcass thickness and rubber compound.
But, fear not, we’ve done the leg work for you.
For each tyre we’ve added what that model is good at, what it’s designed for, whether it’s available with different rubber compounds or carcass thicknesses, and which discipline it’s most suited to.
You can’t overstate the importance of a good set of tyres. They drastically affect how your bike rides, so skimping is a false economy. Finding the best tyres for your needs is far from straightforward though.
Width is crucial. Wider tyres roll faster over soft or bumpy terrain – in timed tests we’ve consistently ridden DH tracks faster on them – so many brands now offer 2.6in options. But a fatter tyre won’t suit everyone, because they can have a bouncy ride feel and won’t fit all frames.
Tread pattern is a key consideration too. Tall, widely-spaced knobs are ideal for muddy or loose terrain, while shorter tread blocks tend to be faster – rolling and more predictable on hard surfaces.
Most MTB tyres are available in several rubber compounds. Softer compounds grip better on roots and rocks, and have a more ‘planted ’ ride feel, because the rubber absorbs more energy from bumps. The downsides are that they wear faster and have more rolling resistance.
Many tyres come with a choice of casings too. Our guide to mountain bike tyre carcass construction has all the detail.
But in short, thicker carcasses are less likely to puncture. Due to stiffer sidewalls, they can usually be run at lower tyre pressures without the sidewall collapsing when cornering. They also provide more damping, so are less bouncy over bumps.
Thinner casings roll faster, especially over bumpy ground, and transmit less feedback at a given pressure.
Tyres are becoming increasingly specialised for the front or rear wheel. Rolling resistance and puncture protection are more of an issue on the rear, as it supports most of the rider’s weight, whereas grip is more important up front, to stop your front wheel sliding out.
That’s the basics covered but we’ve also added an in-depth buyer’s guide and glossary at the end of the article, to help you find exactly what you need.
Many of the MTB tyres we’ve tested recently, and have been impressed by, have been orientated towards trail and enduro riding, and this is reflected in our current list. We have more tyre reviews in the pipeline, and will only recommend tyres we’ve tested and that are current models.
Cross-country tyres are optimised for tamer trails than their downcountry, trail, all-mountain and enduro counterparts. They are typically lighter weight, given that this is a keen focus for cross-country racing.
The Racing Ray is a lightweight, fast-rolling option that corners well. It has a front-specific tread pattern and is designed to be used in tandem with a Racing Ralph rear tyre. The Addix Speed Rubber compound is designed to balance optimum grip, speed and durability. The tyre works very well in most conditions, be it dry or damp. It has great straight-line rolling speed, offers a reassuring feel on corners and is confidence-inspiring when braking.
The Racing Ralph excelled with its fast-rolling ride with class-leading traction and control designed for cross-country racing. Although it’s best to use on the rear, you could run the tyre on the front in dry conditions.
The low-profile tread is designed to reduce weight and keep rolling resistance as low as possible. A red stripe around the tyre’s circumference denotes the Addix Speed compound, designed to provide less drag, more grip, durability and damping. The Racing Ralph Evo TLE is a versatile tyre and grips well in all conditions, great for everyday riding and big distance epics.
We were impressed with the versatility of the Ground Control due to its tread pattern and Gripton compound, which would also make the tyre a good trail riding option. The Ground Control’s are fast-rolling in the dry and they stick to slippery roots and rocks for longer than most lighter cross-country tyres.
The Vittoria Barzo makes for a strong choice on technical courses with its carefully aligned centre blocks, particularly on intermediate to muddy terrain. The open design of the tread pattern helps shed mud quickly and you could use them for trail riding too. The trade-off is that the Barzo suffers on drier terrain.
The Rocket Ron is a fast, grippy tyre that is versatile enough for a range of uses and trail conditions. You could use it for anything from cross-country racing to marathon riding. This particular tyre has Super Ground SpeedGrip casing, signified by the blue stripe on the tyre’s circumference.
This model also foregoes the additional Snakeskin layer – which would denote better sealing, lateral stability and sidewall protection properties – for ultimate weight saving.
Continental’s Race King is an extremely lightweight tyre, even with the ProTection sidewall reinforcement. This tyre is best for dry and hardpacked trails and suffers on the worst of mud due to its closely packed tread pattern. It offers a smooth ride over chattery imperfections and encourages tight lean angles.
Downcountry tyres are a little heavier than cross-country tyres, since weight is not the main focus. They are optimised for slightly burlier terrain and would also be a good choice to fit on a cross-country bike if you want to take it on more technical terrain.
Schwalbe’s Wicked Will Super Race tyre rolls fast and grips well, and proved easy to install on a range of rims. Acceleration and braking are excellent. Its tread consists of a series of square blocks that are relatively closely packed and not too deep in construction.
The Speed Grip rubber isn’t the stickiest, although it’s only slimy rocks and roots that will cause it to slip up, and it’s not the most confident tyre on corners.
Although we’ve classed the Maxxis Ardent EXO TR as a downcountry tyre, it could also serve as a lightweight trail option too. It’d be on the heavy side if you were to use it for cross-country racing.
The Ardent impressed us with its assured cornering and fast-rolling ride. The sidewalls are beefed up for puncture protection. Their stability is noticeable when sprinting out of corners and building up speed over crests and climbs. They maintain their momentum well once up to speed. The shoulder blocks are massive compared with cross-country tyres, allowing you to take more chances in corners.
Trail tyres are heavier than cross-country and downcountry tyres and are designed for improved grip and control on more technical terrain. There are a range of trail tyres for different purposes and conditions.
This iteration of the Magic Mary seriously impressed with their best in-class cornering, surprisingly low rolling resistance and well-damped carcass.
They feature strong shoulder knobs for cornering and grip to all terrain types, from mud to hardpack. The sticky compound glues to hardpack terrain whereas larger knobs dug into softer ground. They were easy to set up and a true fit-and-forget option. We can’t fault them.
We’ve also tested the Schwalbe Magic Mary SuperTrail Addix UltraSoft EVO which scored 4.5 stars. We found these tyres also offered amazing grip but at the expense of rolling speed and durability.
Another tyre with excellent cornering predictability, the Tioga Edge-22 is lightweight and easy to control. Its blocks closely resemble a Maxxis Minion DHF front tyre, with a large central channel. We’d like to see more casing and compound options to suit a greater variety of trail conditions.
Read our full Tioga Edge-22 tyre review
The Maxxis Shorty 3C Max Terra EXO is a mud-specific tyre that offers exceptional levels of grip thanks to its tall, aggressive blocks that bite through soft ground.
Despite its large blocky tread, the Shorty still grips fairly well once it dries out. We’ve seen downhill and enduro racers use the Shorty in completely dry conditions with deep dust.
Built for the muddiest, softest conditions, the WTB Verdict has chunky and widely-spaced knobs. The impressively soft compound stuck to rocks and roots predictably, regardless of speed. Braking traction was great and the light casing was well-damped. It took several attempts to seat the bead correctly on our test tyre though.
All-mountain bridges the gap between trail and enduro. The tyres here are adept in technical terrain but will also be a solid choice for all-day pedalling.
The Minion DHF has been long been a versatile stalwart of the Maxxis range and its latest edition continues that trend. The tread pattern is designed for cornering prowess and rolling speed. The side knobs angle slightly outwards, increasing cornering capabilities and predictability.
We found the Minion DHF to have excellent grip, particularly on hardpack. That said, the MaxxTerra compound suffers in wet conditions and it’s not the best tyre for braking traction. The Minion DHF in this variant is ideal as a dry-weather, speed-focused tyre.
Enduro tyres are designed for more gravity-focused riding and they need to instil confidence and control on rough, technical downhill descents. They also need to pedal well uphill, but there is less of a focus on this aspect compared with trail and all-mountain riding.
Arguably the benchmark of performance for the best mountain bike tyres, the Maxxis Minion DHF Wide Trail 3C TR EXO is a favourite with gravity-fed DH and enduro riders and all-day trailblazers alike.
Its time-proven tread pattern offers predictable grip on a wide range of trail surfaces and the large centre blocks mean it rolls well to boot. The Minion DHF’s lack of grip in properly sloppy and boggy conditions is its only pitfall.
We tested the triple-compound 3C version of the DHF, which offers the ultimate mix of grip, damping and suppleness, but there’s also the cheaper, dual-compound DC version, while the DD is reinforced for flat-out downhill riding.
The Maxxis Minion DHR II impressed with its ride feel and high grip in almost all conditions. It has an assured feel under braking and easily attainable lean angles. This is largely due to the fact that the DHR II’s side knobs are shared with the Minion DHF.
In Double Down casing, which is what we have here, they will handle a serious amount of abuse. The one thing to be aware of is that the tyre clogs in thick mud.
Schwalbe’s Magic Mary scored highly for their exemplary traction and are particularly well suited to soft mud (although they’re not quite as confident in sticky mud, compared with dedicated mud tyres). The tyre has great amounts of braking grip due to the tall tread pattern. There is plenty of edging tread and a generous gap to the centre tread to help bite into corners and off-camber slopes.
Best-suited to rocky, hardpack terrain, the Schwalbe Hans Dampf SuperGravity ADDIX Soft has great straight-line grip with impressive rolling speed. It’s also predictable when leaned over for cornering thanks to its bulky side knobs and the ADDIX Soft rubber is well damped.
It’s not quite up there with the best-performing mountain bike tyres on soft, boggy terrain, though.
Vee Tire Co’s Attack proved impressive on corners with its excellent carcass strength and provided great grip, no matter how hard they were pushed. The sidewall is tough and the tread compound satisfyingly tacky.
The downside to stability and grip are slow rolling speeds on flatter sections, despite the rounded profile. Our sample also leaked air, requiring constant top-ups while riding, which was unfortunate.
Vee Tire Co says the Snap Trail Top 40 can be used for all disciplines except lightweight cross-country. On the trails, we found these to be one of the grippiest tyres out there and it was nigh-on impossible to force it off line. It has great turning ability and braking performance. The tyre features a rounded profile that increased lean angles, allowing more predictable turns. We also found they sealed easily on installation.
They are though quite slow rolling on most terrains, and that is the price paid for the exceptional grip.
WTB’s Judge is the most aggressive rear tyre the brand offers. Even with Fast Rolling compound, there is plenty of traction on offer. This is thanks to the large central knobs that alternate between long and wide to blend braking performance and reduce rolling resistance. WTB recommends pairing with a Verdict up-front.
The Judge has a fairly rounded profile, which helps to provide consistent and predictable cornering grip. The traction is so assured that our tester struggled to ride off-line. They provide all-round grip for different terrain types and work well in slimy terrain too.
The only negative is that we couldn’t achieve a permanent seal on our sample.
The tread pattern of the Schwalbe Big Betty EVO features large, widely-spaced central horizontal blocks to create plenty of braking traction and clear mud. There are also side knobs for improved cornering grip.
We found the carcass to be well-damped over rough terrain, offering plenty of braking traction. The tyre would only drift when pushed to the limit. They grip well on rocks but they’re not a fan of wet roots, despite the soft compound. We found the tyre tricky to mount but it fully sealed once inflated and held air over the test period.
The WTB Verdict 2.5 TCS Tough High Grip offers fantastic wet-weather grip, especially if the trails are sloppy and soft.
WTB also makes a Wet version of the Verdict with even bigger knobs, but we never felt like the standard one needed more to contend with the best mountain tyres. Its compound makes it stick to wet rocks and roots, too.
It doesn’t roll very fast though, and isn’t very grippy or predictable on hardpack trails, or when you’re leaning the bike over in turns.
Your tyres make a massive difference to the character and ride of your bike. We bring you the lowdown on what to look for when buying new mountain bike tyres.
Traditional tyres use an inner tube to keep them inflated, but how do ‘tubeless’ tyres work?
Tubeless tyres ditch the inner tube in favour of a tyre that’s specifically designed to be airtight, either through the use of an additional layer of rubber or the use of a latex-based tubeless sealant.
Mavic’s UST (Universal System Tubeless) system uses a thick side-walled tyre that locks into a specific sealed-bed UST rim. The advantage is an airtight seal with or without a sealant liquid inside, and very stable, pinch puncture-resistant, low pressure performance.
The downsides are that these tyres are more expensive and also heavier.
Most mountain bike tyres on the market today use some sort of ‘tubeless compatible’ system. These tyres use a tubeless bead but require sealant in order to make them airtight. They also require rim tape to seal the spoke holes off.
The benefit of this system is that it is lighter than a full UST system and offers the user a wide variety of tyre choices.
The downside is that there is not an established standard between the various tyre and rim manufacturers, so some rim and tyre combinations work better than others. Even so, this is the most common tubeless option you’ll encounter.
Weight has a big effect on the agility and acceleration of your bike. Light tyres are much easier to spin up to speed, change direction with and even stop, so make sense for cross-country use.
Heavier tyres are generally thicker, which means they resist punctures and pinch flats better and are less likely to flop and roll off at low pressures. Heavier tyres also increase the gyroscopic effect of the wheel, making the bike more stable on the ground or in the air.
At the really heavy end, reinforced-carcass downhill tyres are designed to be run at low pressures without popping or tearing off the rim, and rely on the help of gravity to get their 1kg-plus weight moving.
There’s a massive range of tyre widths available from 1.5in to 5in fat bike tyres. The majority of mountain bikers run tyres in the 2.2in to 2.5in range, and more recently up to 2.6in has become commonplace.
Tyres in this range offer good protection and grip for more aggressive riding. Narrower tyres offer less cushioning and have less ‘footprint’ to grip with.
Pinch flat resistance is lower, too, unless narrower tyres are running higher pressures. They are lighter and roll faster though, and often cut through sticky mud and gloop better.
Square-profile tyres have more edging grip but are harder to lurch into corners. Rounder tyres roll more easily into corners and slide more predictably. Edge grip isn’t as aggressive, though.
There’s a massive range of tyre widths available, from 1.5in to 5in fat bike tyres. The majority of mountain bikers run tyres in the 2.2in to 2.5in range, and more recently up to 2.6in has become commonplace.
Cross-country tyres are likely to be at the narrower end of the scale, while trail/enduro tyres tend to be a little wider. Tyres in this range offer good protection and grip for more aggressive riding.
Narrower tyres, on the other hand, offer less cushioning and have less ‘footprint’ to grip with. Pinch flat resistance is lower on narrower tyres, too, unless they are being ran at higher pressures, which in turn could negatively affect grip.
Narrower tyres often cut through sticky mud and gloop better, though.
Ultimately, the ideal tyre width depends on what you’re riding, where you’re riding and how you’re riding. Weighing up all three aspects will help you find the right tyre.
For a more in-depth explainer on the subject, head to our ultimate test on mountain bike tyre size to determine the fastest width for trail mountain bikes and enduro riding.
This depends on the profile of the tyre, tread pattern, its durometer rating (how soft the rubber the tyre is made from is) and the overall build of the tyre.
Bigger gaps between tread blocks help a tyre shed mud, while taller spikes grip better in soft conditions. This type of tread has more rolling resistance than a lower-profile, more tightly-spaced design though, and can squirm on harder surfaces.
A tyre with a square-profile will have more edging grip but is harder to lurch into corners. Rounder tyres roll more easily into corners and slide in loose terrain more predictably. Edge grip isn’t as aggressive, though.
It’s a slightly simplistic summary, but a tyre that grips well because of a sticky/softer rubber compound and tall square-edged knobs will have more drag than those that don’t. But within this generalisation there are some notable tyres that reduce drag with a slight sloping of tread patterns, multiple tread compounds or the use of a ‘fast’ carcass.
Conversely, some tyres that have barely any tread actually bite as well as some mid-knob rubber.
Some tyres use different compounds for the centre and edge tread blocks, to balance rolling resistance, grip and durability.
All of this depends on your local terrain as well – a super chunky aggressive tyre won’t be as useful on the slick rock of Moab as a lower profile tyre.
In February this year, Brompton announced it will be building a new factory at Ashford in Kent, which is expected to open in 2027.
Brompton is currently the largest manufacturer of bikes in the UK, producing roughly 80,000 per year across its current factory in Greenford, west London, and its specialist titanium facility in Sheffield, in the north of England.
The new factory in Ashford will increase production capacity to approximately 200,000 bikes per year, with staff numbers rising from 850 to 1,500.
The project isn’t just about upping the scale of production, however. Speaking to BikeRadar, Will Butler-Adams, Brompton’s chief executive, is keen to express that Brompton’s vision is much larger than that.
“We want to deliver something that redefines the perception of manufacturing,” he says.
Brompton hopes the factory will change the image of manufacturing away from a remote industry to one more entwined with the local community and ready to find solutions to the world’s problems.
Designed by Kent and London-based architecture practice Hollaway studio, and in collaboration with Ashford Borough Council, which will provide financial support, the round factory building will stand on stilts in a 100-acre floodplain next to Ashford’s retail park. Sixty acres of the floodplain will remain untouched and rewilded into a public nature reserve, with the aim of increasing biodiversity in the process.
The plan, for Butler-Adams, also has a great deal to do with the role he sees Brompton playing in the future from educating consumers to helping reduce emissions through sustainable transport.
Brompton moved into its current factory in Greenford six years ago. According to Butler-Adams, the building “was basically an empty grey box” originally intended for logistics rather than manufacturing.
As a result, Brompton has spent close to £5 million over six years making the building suitable for its needs, from upping power supply capacity to installing extraction and developing research facilities.
Over this time, Brompton has also expanded to take on six units on the site, and Butler-Adams says the company has effectively already outgrown the location.
Part of the reason for finding a new site was to ensure Brompton has enough space to grow in the future, Butler-Adams says.
He points to Frank Williams, founder of the Williams Formula 1 team, who Brompton has collaborated with in the past, as an example of someone who got this right.
“Frank Williams was very smart,” Butler-Adams explains. “He bought a plot of land outside Oxford that was way too big. But over the last 30 to 40 years he’s built out. And that is phenomenal because [while] you might not know what’s going to happen with a business, if you do need to grow, it’s right there.”
Butler-Adams says that despite having looked across the whole country for a new location, being close to London was ultimately paramount. This is because the brand creates a product designed specifically for use in cities and having a workforce that can commute to work using a Brompton will help the brand refine its product further, according to Butler-Adams.
The problem, however, with trying to secure a location near London is space is in high demand – and cost.
“We moved into Greenford on £11 a square foot. The most recent space we’ve taken is £30 a square foot,” Butler-Adams says.
The fact that real estate in and around London is expensive will come as a shock to few. But Butler-Adams says the problem has become even more acute since Covid. The demand for grey logistics spaces near cities has increased as people have relied more on online shopping and delivery, he says.
Ashford wasn’t initially on Brompton’s radar as a possible location, but proximity to London and the local council’s enthusiasm both increased its draw.
Brompton was initially offered a traditional industrial space. This was eventually bought by the UK government to be a lorry park to deal with the overflow of customs checks caused by Brexit. In any case though, Butler-Adams thought the site was boring and wasn’t in line with Brompton’s ambitions.
Guy Hollaway, principal partner at architectural practice Hollaway Studio, suggested the floodplain site and Butler-Adams felt it matched Brompton’s desire to have a park around its site and be part of a community.
Alongside creating a nature reserve and developing a park with trails and cycle paths for the public, there will be enough space at the site to ensure Frank Williams-style growth can take place. This will allow Brompton to expand without having to find another site in the coming decades.
The initial factory will take up 200,000 square feet but Butler-Adams says Brompton has put in planning outlines for up to 500,000 square feet.
The factory itself will be open to the general public with a cafe, museum and visitor centre. This will potentially help integrate Brompton into the community, but will also serve another purpose.
“My belief is we have a serious problem with our environment and we need to consume less,” he explains.
By drawing people from the neighbouring retail park into the building, where they will be able to see into the factory itself, Butler-Adams hopes to help change people’s attitudes toward what they consume.
“If we can drag some of them who are getting a bit bored with a fifth shop to come and see stuff being made, and tell our story about maybe buying a bit less,” Butler-Adams says, “that’s really important to us.”
Calling for people to change what and how much they buy for the sake of the environment, while simultaneously announcing your business will potentially increase production by more than double, might strike some as contradictory. It could be argued that this responsibility should fall on the manufacturer, rather than the consumer.
But Brompton says it is taking steps to be more sustainable and reduce emissions. A press release from the company said the amount of embodied carbon in the new factory will be minimised and the development will “support Brompton in delivering 1.5°C-aligned emission reduction targets as part of Net Zero ambitions.”
Butler-Adams echoes these sustainability and emissions reduction aims, saying the brand is “going to try and be smart.”
He cites as an example of this the integration of ground-sourced heating and cooling into the pylons the factory building will be built upon.
The massive roof of the factory will also be fitted with photovoltaic solar cells, helping Brompton produce its own green electricity.
The factory will also have no new car parking. Instead, it will only be accessible via foot and pedal power.
However, Butler-Adams is under no illusions about the significant energy consumption of the new factory.
“The first thing that’s going to happen at Brompton is we are not going to reduce emissions – if you’re being truthful – because we’re trying to grow,” he says.
Butler-Adams is confident that the emissions per bike will drop, but Brompton will not be able to cut its overall carbon footprint if it is increasing the number of bikes it produces at the same time. This, he says, is where factory work differs from other industries.
“That building will not be net-zero. It would generate power if all we did was go in and fiddle around on computers all day. But if you’re talking about robots, CNC machines, annealing of materials, paint plants, forget it.”
This hasn’t stopped Brompton from signing the Shift Cycling Culture’s Climate Commitment letter, which includes the commitment to reduce C02 emissions by 55 per cent by 2030, among others.
But Butler-Adams says he signs such commitments to force the conversation around environmental responsibility and bring the conversation to the board level, even if he believes “we haven’t got a cat in hell’s chance of delivering net-zero in this industry.”
When it comes to cutting emissions Butler-Adams says the biggest problem in its current bikes is the steel, and he isn’t hopeful we will see green steel in the immediate future.
“That is a massive, industrial, heavy industry. It’s going to take 15 to 20 years to turn it around,” he says.
Scale that problem up to industries significantly larger than cycling, such as construction, which consumes the majority of the world’s steel, and if Butler-Adams is to be believed, it’s hard to feel hopeful.
After all, cycling is just as enmeshed in global supply chains and resource extraction as any other industry, regardless of its comparatively small size. So if steel is a stumbling block for cycling, what chance do other manufacturing industries face?
Butler-Adams is conscious of the role bicycles – which have the lowest carbon footprint of any mode of transport – can play in reducing emissions.
“What we are trying to do is move people out of cars and move people out of motor transport, onto a far more efficient mode of transport. So the product itself has a role to play in diminishing the carbon footprint and ongoing emissions from other forms of transport,” he says.
Butler-Adams sees Brompton’s main job as developing the products that enable a change in how people travel. But the brand’s Campaign for Movement, launched in 2019, was intended to show the potential of cycling to help solve issues from pollution to wellbeing, a sentiment shared by many including Chris Boardman at COP26.
Butler-Adams says one of the areas Brompton wants to work on is street parking. Like the problem of where to place a factory, he sees this issue in terms of space and its cost.
“For some reason, in the last 50 years, car owners believe they have a right to park their car for free in the public realm”, he says, explaining that this is at odds with how precious a commodity space in a city is.
“Having a metal box, electric or non-electric, rusting, and taking up precious space, which is community space, is outrageous,” he says.
While Butler-Adams by no means thinks urban space should be used solely for cycling, he does see the prevalence of cars in cities and drivers’ assumed right to space as things that need to change.
“If you want a car, you ought to be responsible for where it lives and it should not take precious space away from the community that lives there.”
We’ll have to wait and see whether Brompton begins trying to tackle the use of urban space and community. In the meantime, the new factory offers one vision of what ‘community’ in the eyes of Butler-Adams can be.
It also expresses Brompton’s vision for how manufacturing can play a role in the climate crisis, at least in terms of raising awareness. But Butler-Adams’ assertion that the cycling industry hasn’t a cat in hell’s chance of reaching net-zero might knock the optimism off this vision.
Do Butler-Adams’ comments fall into a familiar pattern of cycling companies asserting the green credentials of their products over actually tackling the issues at the point of production? Possibly. Assessing whether the increased emissions of Brompton will be offset by more people trading cars for its bikes will have to be left to more capable hands.
But at least the frankness is a starting point from which to move forward, something Brompton’s CEO is keen to do.
“There are lots of things we’re doing, but we’ve still got an enormous, enormous journey,” he says.
]]>It’s time for another Q&A on the BikeRadar Podcast and with your usual host, Tom Marvin, off on sabbatical, Alex Evans is stepping in for this month’s tech feast.
Alex is joined by our technical editor-in-chief, Robin Weaver, and senior road technical editor, Warren Rossiter, to impart their vast knowledge and answer this month’s questions from you, our dear readers and listeners.
Warren recommends a Shimano-compatible 11-speed Miche cassette that includes the sweet-spot 16t sprocket, while Rob tells why you need to carefully research whether your enduro bike frame is compatible with dual crown forks (or not as the case may be).
We also discuss cycling kit for bigger riders and the best tyres for a mountain bike that’s been converted into a commuter.
Make sure you subscribe to the BikeRadar Podcast via Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your chosen podcast provider, so you don’t miss a future episode.
The BikeRadar Podcast takes you to the heart of the issues that matter, whether you’re a roadie, mountain biker, gravel rider or commuter.
From the latest tech news, reviews and debates, to interviews with the biggest personalities in cycling, the podcast is your direct line into the BikeRadar team.
]]>A new Scott time trial bike, believed to be the Scott Plasma 7, made its WorldTour debut during stage 2 of the 2022 Giro d’Italia.
Ridden by Team DSM’s general classification hopes, Romain Bardet and Thymen Arensman, the new bike combines deep, truncated aerofoil tube shapes with dropped seatstays and an aero seatpost.
The front of the bike tapers to a narrow point on the leading edge, and all of the cables and brake hoses are internally routed through the handlebar and into the frame.
It has more than a passing resemblance to many other recently released time-trial bikes, such as the Merida Time Warp TT, Canyon Speedmax CFR Disc TT and Specialized S-Works Shiv TT Disc.
All of these bikes are designed to optimise aerodynamics within the strict technical regulations set by cycling’s world governing body, the UCI, while still being light and nimble enough for the increasingly hilly and technical time trial courses found in WorldTour races.
As expected, the new bike also uses disc brakes, with the Team DSM riders using the latest Dura-Ace C60 front wheel and RT-MT900 rotors from Shimano’s new Dura-Ace R9200 groupset, combined with brake callipers from the previous Dura-Ace R9100 groupset.
The bike also appears to have a highly adjustable integrated cockpit, with carbon aero extensions that can be adjusted for height, angle and length.
Typically, time-trial specialists have turned to third-party manufacturers, such as Wattshop and AeroCoach, for integrated aero extensions. These can offer ergonomic and aerodynamic performance that surpasses that of standard, round 22.2mm aero extensions.
It looks like Scott has found a way to incorporate at least some of those improvements into its stock design, however, while retaining a wide range of adjustability to suit different riders.
Given previous Scott Plasmas have often used cockpits made by Profile Design, it’s possible this new cockpit is of the same origin.
The unbranded armrests, for example, bear a close resemblance to Profile Design’s Race armrests.
A new bike called the ‘Scott Plasma 7’ recently appeared on the appeared on the UCI’s list of approved framesets, so it’s fair to assume this is that bike.
Given the current UCI-legal time trial bike in Scott’s catalogue is the Plasma 5, and that the Plasma 4, Plasma 3, Plasma 2 and original Plasma came before it, we might have reasonably expected this to be the Plasma 6.
The only problem with that logic, however, is that the Scott Plasma 6 already exists, in the form of a non-UCI-legal triathlon bike.
Rather than following other manufacturers and simply adding a ‘TT’ suffix to the name of its UCI-legal TT bike (as Canyon and Specialized did with the Speedmax CFR and S-Works Shiv Disc, respectively), it looks like Scott has simply decided to keep the count going.
That only Bardet and Arensman were riding it, and both were riding frames that were – based on the amount of armrest stack added – on the small side for riders of their height, suggests Scott only has a limited number of these framesets available, and not in every size.
Alternatively, given the challenging course profiles of both time trials at the 2022 Giro d’Italia, it’s possible both riders simply opted to ride smaller-than-normal frames in search of marginal weight savings (Bardet was even riding an unpainted frameset – a weight saving trick we often see on dedicated hill climb bikes).
We contacted Scott to ask for details about this new bike, and will update this article if we receive any new information.
]]>A wife and husband tag-team turned global cycling brand, Cycology offers striking, design-led cycling kit that doesn’t compromise on technical performance.
What started as a design project for a fashion brand headed up by a keen cyclist has evolved over the past decade, and is now the choice of many style-conscious riders around the world.
From humble beginnings in 2012 with a dozen T-shirt designs, growing customer pleas led Cycology into producing technical cycling kit.
Cycology aligned itself from the start with a factory team that the brand still uses today – a team that were so excited about Cycology’s proposition that they offered small product runs as a passion project to get them started.
Fast forward a decade and there’s a huge range of Cycology kit available, from road cycling apparel to printed handlebar tape, saddle bags and mountain biking clothing, all featuring its proudly original designs. The brand is now distributed internationally beyond its home in Australia to Europe and North America.
Endurance cyclist, runner, triathlete and former commercial artist Sarina Tomchin is the person behind the unique designs that set Cycology apart from other kit brands.
“I find inspiration everywhere,” Sarina explains. “When riding my bike, there’s constant stimulation and ideas. Due to Covid, I was riding a lot on my own, and there’s plenty of time to think about how cycling makes you feel: happy, joyous, fit, healthy and motivated.”
Group rides often yield conversations that lead to ideas for Sarina, as does listening to music and enjoying poetry, art, books and newspaper headlines. Designs have even originated from customer requests, with the brand’s loyal fan base offering up some novel concepts.
“I’ve done artwork recently for a David Bowie, a Led Zeppelin and a Motown jersey,” Sarina reveals. “At my studio, I have a big artwork on paper nearly finished that is based on poetry, graffiti and sketches from one of my many notebooks in lead and red pencil.”
Sarina and her husband Michael launched Cycology to share the thoughts, emotions and feelings that cyclists, runners and triathletes experience. “Through the artwork,” Sarina explains, “we try to portray these thoughts, emotions and the mantras we live by, hoping they’ll resonate with our potential customers.”
Where most modern kits are designed digitally, Sarina takes to paper and canvas with her ideas, with a true multimedia approach including pencil, paint and oils.
Once complete, Sarina’s hand-drawn designs are then photographed and laid onto digital garment templates in Adobe Photoshop. The large-format files are then sent to Cycology’s factory to produce a run of samples.
The sample kit is then worn and laundered by a team of wear testers to make sure they live up to the brand’s high standards, and any tweaks are made before final production.
Besides creating the original artwork, Sarina puts her background in textiles and pattern-making to good use during the design process.
“The fabrics and tech [Cycology uses] have always been super-important to me and we try extremely hard to get our fabrics to feel so good you don’t necessarily ‘feel’ them while wearing them,” says Sarina.
“We want soft, light, sweat-wicking, stretchy-in-every-direction fabrics and we’ve also been trying wherever possible to be environmentally friendly.”
Besides the material choice, safety features are also paramount for Sarina, with high visibility and reflective elements woven into the design of each product, and bright, fluoro colours featuring heavily throughout the range.
“I want to be seen for miles when I’m on my bike, whether it’s dark or light,” Sarina says.
“Too many friends have been hit, maimed or killed by motorists, which was the reason I painted ‘See Me’ with tears. I never intended to make it into a kit, but a customer asked us to make the artwork into a jersey.
“At the time, I didn’t think it could work, but it has. I love wearing it, and it is one of our best sellers. Pure emotion, pure colour.”
Cycology offers an extensive range of kit and designs for men and women, with artwork and cuts tailored for each. The goal? To make cycling a more comfortable, and more fashionable sport, encouraging more women who want to look and feel good on bikes.
Sustainability is also a key factor in the design, with the team sourcing recycled fabrics as well as recycling as much as possible in-house.
“Personally, we also do as much as possible, we only eat plants, we recycle madly, mend, fix, compost, reuse,” says Sarina. “Every little thing we can do helps the planet we love and we ride whenever, wherever we can.”
From complete road cycling kits to more trail-oriented pieces, a whole raft of accessories and casual wear, there’s plenty to feast your eyes on with the Cycology range.
Who said matchy-matchy has to stop at accessories? Available in an impressive range of designs, Cycology’s short-finger cycling gloves feature foam-padded palms with a grippy silicone finish to give you both comfort and control on the bike.
For cooler weather, consider the fleece-lined and windproof winter full-finger cycling gloves also on offer.
Choose between the standard performance fit, figure-fitting aerodynamic race fit and more casual relaxed-fit jerseys on offer from Cycology, with myriad designs for men’s and women’s cuts.
There are also long-sleeve and winter windproof jerseys to keep you cycling in comfort throughout the winter months.
We cyclists love a fun pair of socks, and there are both printed, reflective and more plain options from Cycology. All measure 18cm from the ankle, a popular length among riders, and the printed socks use a light compression fit to keep them in place while you ride.
Why save the fun kit just for the road? Cycology has recently branched out into looser-fit, off-road jerseys, with both short-sleeve and long-sleeve options for your favourite MTB and gravel rides.
A sweat-wicking, lightweight mesh material is used for the mountain biking jerseys to keep you cool and fresh while shredding, whether that’s a local cross-country loop, enduro race or simply hitting the trails with friends.
Share your love for all things bike with Cycology’s line-up of soft combed cotton T-shirts featuring original artwork. Road, mountain bike or triathlon: there’s something for everyone.
]]>When Marin launched its first electric mountain bike, the Alpine Trail E2, at the very tail end of 2020, I was lucky enough to swing a leg over one of the first test samples in the country to bring you all a full review.
I was seriously impressed with the Californian brand’s debut attempt at electrification.
Its top-notch spec, reasonable price tag and awesome performance meant I awarded it 4.5 stars in my Marin Alpine Trail E2 review, which in turn earned it a place in our list of the best electric mountain bikes currently on sale.
Of course, I wouldn’t be a technical editor if I didn’t think there was some room for improvement.
This edition of BikeRadar Builds kicks off with the Alpine Trail E2’s already stellar performance, and looks to build on it with a number of choice upgrades and changes designed to coax out every last drop of available performance, and make this ebike truly mine.
BikeRadar Builds is our occasional look at the team’s personal bikes, including custom rigs, commuters, dream builds, component testbeds and more.
This is our chance to geek out about the bikes we’re riding day-to-day, and explore the thinking (or lack of it!) behind our equipment choices.
Having raved about the bike in my review, I put my money where my mouth is and purchased this Alpine Trail E2 from Marin with my hard-earned cash.
Along with using my heating even less to finance the purchase, it also meant I had a great starting point from which to begin my customisation journey.
At the heart of the E2 is Shimano’s DU-EP800 motor and large 630Wh capacity battery. Heavy-hitting parts such as Fox’s venerable 38 fork and DHX2 rear shock also feature, bolstering the Marin’s exceptional value.
The frame boasts internally-routed cables, chain slap protection and space for a water bottle within the front triangle.
It has a linkage-driven single-pivot rear suspension system offering 150mm of rear wheel travel, and is roughly 17 per cent progressive.
All these elements are combined with near-Goldilocks mountain bike geometry.
The head angle is around 63 degrees, while the seat tube angle sits at 78 degrees.
The size large I own has a 485mm reach figure and 435mm chainstays. These combine with a 1264mm wheelbase and a seriously low 686mm standover height, plus a short seat tube with a large insertion depth for long-travel dropper posts.
From the first time I rode an Alpine Trail E2 I was convinced it had more to give, and being able to buy one has given me the perfect opportunity to make all the modifications and changes I wanted to prove that theory.
If you’re interested in building your own Marin Alpine Trail E, two models are available.
The Alpine Trail E1 costs £4,465 – a relative bargain in today’s market – and is fitted with with Shimano’s E7000 motor and 504Wh battery, with RockShox rather than Fox suspension.
It features the same geometry and frameset as the E2, however, and would be an awesome starting place to build your own dream version of an ebike.
The more costly E2, which retails for £5,765, is the starting point for my custom build.
Let’s start with the biggest and most important change first.
In an attempt to provide full disclosure I wouldn’t say I dislike mullet bikes (29in front, 27.5in rear), and I’ve certainly loved riding several in recent times (keep your eyes peeled for our 2022 Ebike of the Year reviews, which include loads of mullet-wheeled monsters).
But if given a choice, I’d always fit 29in wheels front and back to one of my personal bikes.
The wagon-wheel setup is arguably quicker, gives more grip and provides a smoother more stable riding character.
I’d also argue the mullet setup doesn’t ‘create the best of both worlds’ (in terms of stability and agility) because a bike can only really be one thing. It’s either stable, agile or somewhere in between, but can’t be simultaneously the most stable and agile.
And that’s why I went feet-first into tuning up Alpine Trail E2’s pet hate of mine: its 2.8in wide, 27.5in diameter rear tyre and wheel.
I swapped out the stock wheels for a set of Roval’s Traverse Alloy 29in wheels front and back, with the latter fitted with a normal-sized 2.5in wide Maxxis High Roller II, to de-mullet it.
I’ve specced the DoubleDown casing, 3C MaxxTerra compound version of the popular rubber because I feel it offers the best balance between traction, wear rate and carcass stability.
Up front, I’ve fitted an EXO+ casing Minion DHF, but had to forego the preferred 3C MaxxGrip compound as this isn’t a combination available in my preferred 29×2.5in size.
So what has changing out the rear 27.5in wheel for a 29in hoop done to the marvellous geometry? Well, not all that much.
To get a flavour of the changes, you only need to look to Marin’s human-powered Alpine Trail XR. This bike has 29in wheels front and rear from the factory, but because the two bikes share almost identical geometry, the swap to a big wheel on the E2 brings it very close to the XR’s figures.
The head angle now sits at 63.5 degrees, while the wheelbase has extended to 1,283mm and BB lifted marginally to 339mm – which is still seriously low.
There’s more than enough tyre clearance at the rear of the E2 to take the 29in wheel and 2.5in rubber… it’s almost like the brand designed it to be both 27.5in and 29in compatible.
Not satisfied, I wanted more. But this time from the front end.
Although the 160mm-travel Fox 38 fitted to the E2 has plenty of squish, and adding an extra 10mm doesn’t seem like much, out on the trail that extra give meant a few things.
Firstly I could run the fork a bit softer than the 160mm version, while maintaining my preferred handlebar height without needing to add loads of stem stackers.
It also meant I could create a larger negative air vacuum within the fork’s lowers, by releasing air from the lower leg bleed valves while the forks were compressed, without dramatically impacting ride height.
Releasing air from the bleeders improves small-bump sensitivity and traction, and produces similar results to increasing the negative air spring size or pressure by making the forks more eager to compress or suck down into their travel.
Swapping out the Fox 38 air spring was relatively simple, requiring only a few basic tools, some of the recommended Fox suspension fluid and a small amount of knowledge.
All Fox 38 forks can be changed between 160mm and 180mm of travel with an air spring swap. A new air spring costs £159.95.
Of course, if you’re looking to change the fork travel on your bike, please check whether the longer distance is within your manufacturer’s recommended travel specifications before fitting them to avert voiding your warranty.
Shimano’s EP8 motor offers impressive battery life, user tuneable modes, is relatively light and has proven to be seriously frugal. Combined, these virtues make me think it is the best electric mountain bike motor currently on sale.
But it’s not without its faults.
The biggest of these, in the context of the Marin E2, relate not to the motor itself but to the e*thirteen e*spec cranks fitted from the factory. These cranks have been linked to cases of EP8 bottom bracket spindle failure.
Not wanting to suffer from this issue, I fitted a pair of Shimano’s own EP8 compatible FC-EM600 cranks for the princely sum of £31.99.
With these cranks fitted from new, and installed according to Shimano’s instructions, my EP8 motor warranty should be preserved if the worst happened.
This wouldn’t be a BikeRadar Builds bike without taking a look at each of the hand-picked, top-performing and hyper-functional parts, curated for my rather specific needs.
Rescued from an old long-term test bike, my Yeti SB165, these are enormously powerful brakes, and are super lightweight too.
Swapping out the stock Shimano SLX M7120 stoppers for these was a doddle thanks to the like-for-like brake hoses and fittings.
A simple gravity method bleed – where the bleed nipple is opened, a full-of-oil bleed up is attached to the lever, and gravity is left to its work to pull fluid through the system – was required to get them working without having to do any internal cable routing surgery.
Unusually, however, I’ve paired the Shimano brakes with SRAM’s CenterLine rotors (rather than the new HS2 which are fitted to my other bike). Although not officially recommended, I had no choice but to go for this pairing.
To the best of my knowledge Shimano doesn’t make a STEPS ebike compatible six-bolt disc rotor with in-built speed sensor magnet. That means users of Shimano motors with six-bolt hubs need to get a little creative or change their hubs for Center Lock versions to fit official STEPS discs.
Using a widely available Bosch speed sensor magnet with the EP8, while not recommended, is common practice even among OE manufacturers – including for Santa Cruz on the Bullit.
Thanks to the shape of the six-bolt Shimano XT SM-RT86 Ice Tech rotors I wanted to use, I wasn’t able to fit the magnet without it fouling the frame.
That meant using SRAM’s CenterLine discs, where between each of the rotor’s spokes is a large gap the magnet could fit into, was the only option.
These components from OneUp are all favourites of mine and have been fitted to many previous test bikes.
I love the shape and feel of the Carbon bar and have paired it with OneUp’s EDC stem. This means I have the option of installing the brand’s EDC tool inside the steerer tube without having to tap threads into it.
The OneUp Dropper Post V2 offers one of the shortest lengths for the most travel of any post out there. Plus it’s really simple to service and has proven to be incredibly reliable after miles and miles of testing.
On the Marin E2, I’ve fitted the 210mm-travel version but have installed 20mm of internal travel spacers, taking post drop down to 190mm.
Although more travel is frequently better, I don’t like to have my seat totally slammed on descents because I use the inside of my thighs against it to control the bike, something that isn’t possible if it’s too low.
Thanks to the dropper lever’s I-Spec compatibility, I’ve also managed to reduce some of the bar clutter and fix the compatibility issues I moaned about on the stock Alpine Trail E2.
This means I’ve cleared up a bit of space on the bars, fitting the motor controller between the brake lever and grip.
Although these have officially been discontinued, with Fabric ceasing trading, remaining stock is still available to buy from certain retailers for reduced prices.
I absolutely love these grips. They’re soft, comfortable, the right diameter and have just enough movement and flex to reduce vibrations and harshness rather than enhance them.
If you can find a set (that I’ve not already bought myself) then I would strongly recommend buying them.
I got a bit of a preview of the Aidon X5 saddle’s comfort while I was doing the testing for 2022’s Ebike of the Year, where I spent many hours sitting on the ebike-specific perch from Fizik.
Fortunately it proved to be incredibly comfortable and shot to the top of my ‘must have’ list when it came to building up my own dream-spec ebike. This alloy-railed version weighs 272g.
Living in the UK, a fit-and-forget front mudguard is a must. While Fox makes its own mudguard for the 38 fork, I find it doesn’t offer enough wheel coverage, allowing more mud to spit up onto my face than is ideal.
The Mudhugger Evo (long) is the solution to this problem, and this Evo version has received iterative changes over the old one.
Its stepped design now offers more crown clearance to stop it banging against the guard at bottom out. The lengthy rear portion provides plenty of mud protection to boot.
While this version is attached to my forks using zip ties, velcro straps are supplied with the guard and Mudhugger even makes a direct mount version that screws directly into the back of the fork arch.
My love for flat pedals started the day I took up mountain biking and has never waned.
These ludicrously sized (128(L)x95(W)mm) pedals represent a change in direction for flats, where the maker claims they’ll revolutionise flat-pedal riding with unparalleled foot stability and traction
Testing is still ongoing – which is why they’re fitted to this bike – but initial impressions are positive, where foot twist and clawing have virtually been eliminated.
Keep tuned for a full review soon.
Although the E2 comes fitted with a Shimano Deore XT M8100 rear derailleur that I’ve kept bolted to the bike, the shifter and cassette are from the Shimano SLX M7100 range.
On my quest to shave grams where possible and make functional upgrades, I saw these two components as easy targets.
I swapped the shifter for a Shimano XTR M9100 unit, much preferring the positive click of the lever, and lost three whole grams in the process.
The cassette – now upgraded to an XT M8100 10-51t tooth unit I had from an old test bike – saved a further 46g, but this time from the all-important rotational and unsprung mass of the bike’s rear wheel.
Are these marginal gains? Yep. Do they offer a significant improvement in performance? Arguably, no.
They do look and feel good though.
Having recently tested these wheels – you can read my Roval Traverse Alloy 29 review – I was seriously impressed by the balance of comfort, steering accuracy and reliability they offered.
At just 1,939g for the pair, they shaved a significant amount of weight off the bike compared with the stock Marin hoops, hopefully without compromising strength.
Although the £650 asking price isn’t cheap, it’s still significantly less than the likes of the Zipp 3Zero Moto, ENVE AM30, and even the DT Swiss EXC 1501 Spline One wheels.
And as I already mentioned, these wheels are wrapped in Maxxis rubber with a DoubleDown rear casing and EXO+ at the front.
As the bike currently stands – pedals and all – it tips the scales at 24.6kg.
Without pedals that drops to 24.07kg, only 1.37kg heavier than the mind blowing Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo (22.7kg), once I’d fitted GRID Gravity casing tyres to it.
In terms of cost, that’s a tricky figure to pin down.
The initial £5,765 asking price of the Marin has clearly inflated somewhat, but quite a few of the parts I’ve removed I would be able to sell to claim some money back.
If I was just totting up the cost of the upgrades without spending time on eBay getting cash back I’d be looking at a total cost of £8,407.92.
There’s a staggering array of great mountain bikes available under £2,000. Luckily, BikeRadar has done the heavy lifting for you and put together the very best mountain bikes under £2,000 (that’s around $2,500) in 2022.
Between £1,000 and £2,000 is the point that full-suspension mountain bikes begin to make more sense, with decent builds that have few compromises.
If you’re looking to buy a hardtail in this price range, you’ll also have a hard time buying a bad one. This price bracket is a popular one for enthusiast cyclists, which has made for an incredibly competitive market, forcing brands to spec bikes with increasingly high-quality builds, including more expensive mountain bike groupsets.
If you’re looking for something a bit cheaper, be sure to check out our guides to the best mountain bikes under £1,000, £750 and £500.
If you’re feeling a little more flush, our guides to the best mountain bikes under £3,000 and the best trail bike should do the trick.
Lastly, for a more overall guide, check out our guide on how to choose the right mountain bike for you.
Calibre’s Triple B is the better-specced sibling of the Bossnut (see below), kitted out with SRAM’s Guide RE brakes, NX Eagle 12-speed drivetrain and a RockShox Sektor RL fork and Monarch RS rear shock.
This top-tier spec – for the cash – is backed up by modern trail bike geometry that boasts a 65.5-degree head angle, 74-degree seat-tube angle and a lengthy 460mm reach on the size large, which combines to provide a superb ride.
Our testers loved how the Triple B tackled fast and flowy terrain and supported them through turns and compressions without wincing over trickier ground.
It is a bit on the hefty side, so if you’re really worried about headline weight figures you might want to consider another bike – although we challenge you to find one that performs as well as the Triple B at this price.
The Boardman MTR 8.9 is the less expensive version of the MTR 9.0. It has the same alloy frame, geometry and suspension as its pricier sibling but with a more affordable SRAM NX Eagle drivetrain.
The bike is comfortable and has a relaxed riding position. However, the seat-tube angle does feel too relaxed when climbing steep gradients.
The rear suspension doesn’t bob too much under pedalling, rewarding your input with quick acceleration. It still has enough give, absorbing small bumps. The RockShox 35 Gold RL front fork also does a good job at absorbing bumps, even on steep climbs.
Despite only having an 11-50t cassette and 32t front chainring, the bike doesn’t feel lacking in gears, thanks to its low weight and snappy suspension.
The inclusion of a dropper post enhances the bike’s ride and improves flow on trail centre loops, for which it is well-suited.
On descents, the SRAM Guide T brakes can feel wooden and the bike is a little noisy. But despite these issues, the MTR 8.9 is a fun bike to ride. It’s ripe for upgrades and we’d choose to turn it into a light and fast mile-munching machine.
Because the Triple B and Bossnut share the same frame, you get the same fantastic geometry as the more expensive model.
So it’s in the spec where Calibre has saved the money. There’s a RockShox Recon RL fork and Monarch R shock, a cheaper SX Eagle drivetrain and SRAM Level T brakes.
For the cash, our expert testers really struggled to fault the Bossnut out on the trails, but because it lacks Boost axle spacing, you might have a hard time finding compatible wheels when it’s time to upgrade.
Canyon says the Stoic 4 is “the best Enduro hardtail”, and it is true that the bike can fly down descents like a full-suspension bike – as long as things don’t get too rough – while retaining that hardtail simplicity.
It achieves this thanks to a solid rear end that can gain speed from every rise and fall in the trail as well as the modern, slack geometry.
The long wheelbase helps spit you out of turns perfectly and you can maintain control over rocks and roots. The dropper post also opens up plenty of room for you to move around.
This aluminium bike might be aimed at descending, but it won’t make getting to the top of a trail a drag because it ascends surprisingly fast considering its burly 14.86kg weight and gnarly tyres.
With a 140mm travel RockShox fork and SRAM groupset, the Stoic has a great spec for the price, although there are also two less costly versions of the Stoic in Canyon’s lineup, starting from £799.
The Kona Kahuna hardtail mountain bike has been around for decades, with the brand continually refining the bike.
The latest version sees Kona move toward cross-country and trail bike efficiency with superb ride quality. The shape of the bike means you can still take on rough terrain with the aluminium frame smoothing out bumps.
But be warned – experienced riders may find the Kahuna’s limits fairly quickly and it’s not particularly suited to aggressive downhill riding.
The spec is admirable considering the price. The 12-speed Shimano Deore drivetrain performs almost as well as the brand’s XT groupset found on bikes costing up to £10,000. The Shimano MT410 brakes have loads of power and the long levers give plenty of hand positions.
The 100mm RockShox Recon Silver RL front fork does, though, move through its travel quickly, and it would be nice to see a dropper post fitted to the bike.
Compared to bikes at the leading edge of the sport, the Merida Big. Trail 500’s geometry is relatively short. This means on paper it doesn’t have the stability of bikes with a longer wheelbase.
But the Merida has a shorter seat tube than many other bikes, allowing riders to size up without worrying about standover height, unlocking a longer reach and a more stable wheelbase.
With this in mind, the Big. Trail 500 is a comfortable climber. The longer reach in testing meant there was plenty of room to move around and the steep seat tube improved comfort, made pedalling easier and reduced front wheel lift.
When it comes to descents, the Recon fork has plenty of mid-stroke and low-speed compression helping you go fast and amplifying the aluminium frame’s calm feel.
The mix of Merida’s own-brand kit, including a dropper post, and branded kit from Shimano keeps the bike’s price down but this doesn’t stop it from being one of the most capable bikes for under £2,000.